Poor Richard: I like Robin of Berkeley, but on this we disagree. I’m much more inclined to believe “The Pathological Narcissist” assessment by Ali Sina. I understand her concern for Obama as a damaged person, but my concern is for our country and this “damaged person” just happens to be in the most powerful position in the world — a place where he can harm many more people than just himself.
Robin gets one thing right — Obama is frustrated by anyone who disagrees with him. Their reasons do not matter to him. He abhors being contradicted for he is beyond reproach in his own mind – a very dangerous thing to be. She is also right that he will likely become even more vicious and violent as things increasingly turn against him this fall.
I believe that underneath Mr. Cool’s ever-so-thin skin lies a boiling hatred for America and all things American including her people. Leftists need a scapegoat… a villain to sustain their own flawed world view, and America is Obama’s villain. We are the root cause of all the world’s ills and he has decided it is up to him to teach us a lesson. That is his self-glorifying purpose… to bring about America’s downfall.
Anyone who believes Obama somehow has America’s best interest at heart, that he is a good person who’s words and action stray from that purpose by accident, and only because his has a mistaken political philosophy or is badly inexperienced is fooling themselves.
I now believe Obama will be impeached next year over the election bribery scandals. I also believe if the Senate Judiciary Committee returns articles of impeachment for a vote in the House that he will resign before removal is possible — just as Nixon did. And just as Nixon was the GOP’s albatross, so too have Obama Pelosi and Reid led to the the Democrats downfall for the next dozen years.
No man rises upon a throne of power, but for the Will of God. Obama’s rise and fall could turn out to be the best thing that could have ever happened to save America. We have rediscovered ourselves. We can turn from the path of secular liberalism and political correctness to be reborn as a nation. We can increase our nation’s future and our fortune. We need only turn ourselves and our prosperity back to God, to become His nation again.
A Shrink Asks: What’s Wrong with Obama?
So what is the matter with Obama? Conservatives have been asking this question for some time. I’ve written a number of articles trying to solve the mystery.
Even some liberals are starting to wonder. James Carville railed about Obama’s blasé attitude after the catastrophic oil spill. The New York Times’ Maureen Dowd revamped Obama’s “Yes We Can” motto into “Will We Ever?”
The liberal women of the TV show “The View” have expressed sympathy for Michelle Obama’s living with a man so out of touch. Peggy Noonan, hardly a vehement Obama foe, recently pronounced him disconnected.
Obama’s odd mannerisms intrigue a psychotherapist like me. He also presents a serious diagnostic challenge.
{ 7 comments… read them below or add one }
Robin misses the real, underlying psychosis which is undermining Obama, demonic possession. ( Keeep it simple, stupid!) Seriously, Sybil, I think we can agree that Obama is a puppet and removing him will no longer solve, or even alleviate, the problem. The structure is in place, and it is largely financed by George Soros, the manifestation of Satan on Earth. He is now the problem, because his puppets are in control, and Obama is only one of them.
Great stuff Richard. From my perspective, Obama is becoming more and more unhinged as time goes by. I’ve also noticed that his behavior always seems to be more bizarre when he is either challenged or having difficulty with getting his message across.
I believe we might be witnessing the early stages of a meltdown. if I’m correct, this is going to be classic…tons of warning signs and the MSM stands silent. Not to mention the damage both the Democratic Party and the Kool-aid drinkers will inflict upon themselves if this guy outright loses it.
I’ve been saying it for months, I predict Obama will not complete his first term.
Demonic possession (aka schizophrenia, etc.) often comes from drug and alcohol use. When this begins in teenage years the chances of addiction are 5 times higher than usual. The cokehead in chief is on schedule.
Unfortunately intoxication is commonplace in prosperous societies where morality is not strong, the father is absent and where tolerance for wrong doers is prevalent. We have more to do than just study the Constitution. We have to take a hard look at the results of immoral behavior and stop rewarding it with entitlements.
This is starting to remind me of Hamlet. I’ll eschew the quote, since Denmark has enough problems already. We all agree, but now the rest of the nation is beginning to smell the stench.
Sibyl West wrote:
“Demonic possession (aka schizophrenia, etc.) often comes from drug and alcohol use. When this begins in teenage years the chances of addiction are 5 times higher than usual. The cokehead in chief is on schedule.”
You are so far off-target. Demonic possession is not the same as schizophrenia, do some studying. Schizophrenia is a mental disorder which is caused by abnormalities in genes, neurotransmitters, and brain structure. It does “come from drug and alcohol use.” From my Abnormal Psychology textbook – “Clinical investigators have observed that people who take high doses of cocaine may develop cocaine psychosis – a short term syndrome very similar, but completely different, than schizophrenia.”
This article you have posted here is written by “Robin of Berkeley” who is apparently a psychotherapist. If she were a psychotherapist, she would know that you cannot make a diagnosis without talking to the patient. To make any kind of diagnosis without first talking to someone is simply wrong in the field of psychiatry.
As far as Obama still doing cocaine while in office? Complete slander. Do you have any idea how hard it would be for a cokehead to get elected as President of the United States?
You don’t think Bammy is treating the USA like Charlie Sheen treated that hotel room? And he told Jon Stewart, with a certain satisfaction, that the people don’t even know about all he has done. There are some who would disagree with you. Judge a thing by it’s result.
Our job is not to psychoanalyze you people. Our job is to defeat you. And we will do that at the ballot box.
As for a cokehead CIC, I don’t know about the Bamster but Clinton most certainly was a notorious cocaine fiend during parts of his career. I lived across the river from Arkansas when he was gov, his womanizing and drug use was common knowledge.
But that is all beside the point Emmit. Geez…Sibyl’s assertion that you people are hung-up on (because it was in the freakin’ New Yorker no less) is a reply to a comment on someone else’s story. It is presented as her opinion, not scientific fact. AND it is merely an inference, the reader can draw his own conclusions.
To pick at this point while ignoring the issue at hand, Obama’s destructive behavior, is reactionary and devoid of proper perspective.
No, I don’t have a license, it’s just my opinion.
{ 2 trackbacks }